Sex-Rejecting Hormones For Dysphoria is Like Chemotherapy for ‘Identifying as Having Cancer’
Dr. Eithan Haim, Gender Dysphoria Whistleblower
This week, the Supreme Court handed down an opinion that should make every mom, dad, pastor, coach, and common-sense Alaskan praise God.
In United States v. Skrmetti, the Court said states like Tennessee have the authority to prohibit doctors from giving puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to kids. Why?
The Biden administration and the Left claimed the law was “discrimination” and sued Tennessee.
The US Supreme Court opinion makes it clear that Tennessee was regulating a dangerous medical practice, not targeting people.
What This Law Actually Does
Here’s what the Tennessee law says:
- No puberty blockers or hormone injections for sex-rejecting transition in minors.
- Still allows treatment for kids with medical conditions like early puberty or hormone disorders.
It’s not about who the kid is—it’s about what the drug is for.
What the Supreme Court Said
The Court said this law doesn’t treat boys and girls differently. It treats everyone the same—no experimental sex-rejecting drugs for minors, period.
And they said the government isn’t required to go along with every new social trend. States can make laws to protect children—even if that makes activists angry.
In other words: we still live in a country where common sense can win.
The Left’s Arguments Were Nonsense
The liberal justices (Sotomayor, Jackson, and Kagan) wrote a dissent that sounded like something out of a college sex-rejecting studies class:
- They said the law is “cruel.” But what’s cruel is making a 13-year-old sterile for life.
- They said it’s like banning someone from going to church. Huh? Since when is prescribing testosterone a religious right?
- They said the law was based on “sex assigned at birth.” That’s not a legal term—that’s a buzzword from TikTok, not legal prose from one of America’s “legal experts.”
Dr. Eithan Haim, a whistle blower on sex-rejecting hormone experiments said that leftist claims that treating gender dysphoria in children with puberty blocking and cross-sex hormones is like ‘giving chemotherapy to patients who merely ‘identify’ as having cancer.
Justice Thomas, in particular, called out their nonsense with calm, clear truth. He reminded us: judges aren’t here to rewrite the Constitution based on feelings.
What This Means for Us
This case is a green light for other states. Alaska can protect kids from sex-rejecting clinics with Supreme Court backing.
While the current legislature will kill any bill prohibiting sex-rejecting experiments on children, we can advance budget restrictions that prohibit Alaskans from being forced to pay for these dangerous and deadly child experiments.
The Skremetti ruling:
- Supports parents
Protects children
Defends state rights
Pushes back on sex-rejecting madness
Keeps unelected judges in their lane
Alaska Right to Life is Staying in the Fight
This is a huge win—but the battle in Alaska hasn’t even started.
In 2024, the Republican led Alaska House voted to fund sex-rejecting hormone and surgical experiments on children.
Every Republican but three in the Senate voted the same way – to pay for sex-rejecting hormone and surgical experiments on children.
In 2025, the Democrat led majorities in both the House and Senate rejected attempts to block that funding (strangely offered by the same people that voted FOR the funding the year prior).
2026 must hold different outcomes: the Skrmetti case will either provide legal cover or remove excuses weak Republicans have used to allow children to be irreversibly experimented on.
Let’s protect children. Let’s defend families. And let’s keep using our voices while we still have them.